Saturday, 7 May 2011

Documentary Evaluation "Quick Fashion"

Before making our documentary "Quick Fashion" we began researching shows of a similar nature which are very popular with the British public. The shows we took a lot of inspiration from were "Gok Wan's Fashion Fix"and "What not to wear."  By watching the shows we gained a better understanding of the conventions that are typically common with these types of documentries.
Firstly we were interested in creating a similar scenario, where a member of the public is either set up by family/friends or either seeking assistance themselves to improve their wardrobe and appearance with the help of a stylist to point them in the right direction and enable them to feel comfortable and confident in more fashionable outfits. We  noticed how Gok Wan is always chatty, friendly and genuinely cares about the woman  whose style and life he is  changing, so therefore we created a similar presenter with these characteristics and mannerisms.

Challenging  the conventions slightly, we introduced a spy camera, to "spy" on our makeove going about their daily routine to hightlight that they urgently need a complete new change of style. This followed up with short interviews of  our makeove's close friends, saying what they thought of her style and what improvments she could make. By using this technique we thought it would be the best tool of encouragment for our makeove, so that she could see herself from a different perspective.

I would say that the combination of our documentary and our ancillary tasks are very  effective and work well together. The storyboard that we created is very clear and precise,  showing how we planned out and organised each filming stage of our documentary, by listing the types of shots we wanted to include and how long each scene would run for.
For my individual poster and double page spread tasks , I made  initial drafts of how I wanted them to look, and feel that  i've successfully achieved each of these tasks  with my final photoshopped versions.

The audience feedback we received from our fashion documentary questionnaire showed that  people who watch these types of shows are mainly female and between the ages of 16-25. We also discovered that women find these type of documentaries more enjoyingable to watch and also showed that they gain more fashion advice and help from this , than they do by reading fashion magazines,stating that the documentaries focus more on teaching the participants and viewers at home to chose the right clothes for their size and shape and also how they can get their hands on stylish items without having to break the bank, by recommending the best highstreet shops to go to for bargain prices.

Piecing our documentary together we used the help from new media technologies such as, Apple Mac's (imovie) , Abode Photoshop, and http://www.blogger.com/

On the Apple Mac's we used a software called imovie, were we began arranging and editing scenes. At first I found it a little confusing, as I didn't have any prior experince with working with Apple Mac's before, however after a few go's I quickly learnt the ins and outs of how the software. 
For ancillary task I used Abode Photoshop which I was very confident  about, as i was very familiar already with how the settings worked and what tools I would need to use to create my poster.
Throughout the whole process of planning and filming our documentary, I use an online blog to upload and store all the planning and research that we carried out in order to make our final product.

Final Documentary (Quick Fashion)

Thursday, 5 May 2011

TV Poster - Ancillary Task 1 (Final Photoshopped Version)

"Quick Fashion" - Poster Draft

Shot List

Shooting Schedule


To Do List (Improvements and furthur filming)

  • Add music to clips - upbeat/pop e.g. Lady Gaga
  • Family and friend interviews
  • Film Angelica and Janice walking in the highstreet, shopping for new outfits
  • Film highstreet stores and Brighton momuments e.g. pier, pavillion theatre- (for the opening scene)
  • Re-film wardrobe scene, and Anglica talking to Janice about her style
  • Film short clips to introduce longer scene's (e.g. before Angelica goes through to inspect Janice's wardrobe
  • Record narration and voice over to play along side footage in  particular scenes
  • Include titles/credits and name tags for interviewee's
  • Put a Channel 4 logo/tag before "Quick Fashion" starts
  • Speed up and shorten scenes to lower the total running up of documentary down to 5mins

"Quick Fashion" - Storyboards






First plan for Fashion Documentary

Roles:
Me - Camera
Jodie - Presenter Angelica Elle - dressed in smart/causal clothes
Nicola - Janice -the person having the makeover - dressed in baggy clothes and dull colours


-Opening Scene: The presenter walking down the highstreet introducing  giving an overview of Janice's makeover ( fast cuts and quick flashes)

-Janice saying what her fashion lifestyle is like at the moment (Location - My House)
- Friend and Family interviews sharing what they think of Janice's style and appearance
-Cuts back to Angelica in the centre of town/beach saying "lets see what we can do"
- Show clothes laid out before and after includung the prices and a voiceover explaining where the clothes were brought from.  Two outfits daytime/evening
- Archive footage of fashion shows and celebrities wearing similar clothes to what Janice will be wearing.
- The presnter giving fashion advice to the audience "Here are some tips and tricks for you to try at home"
- Ending the Documentary with an Ad break "Coming up after the break Janice gets her makeover"
- Close up of Janice's eye make up, and accesory's such as ring, earrings, necklace, belt etc
-Over the Shoulder shot-  Mirror turning around to face  Janice, and reveal her new look.

Props:
Janice's clothes  - Baggy oversized clothes, jumperr/hoodies
Angelica's clothes - smart, casual, sleek, tailored, blazer + glasses
2 sets of nice fashionable outfits
Accessories - corsages, rings, necklace, bags, hats, belts etc

Questionnaire

Research on popular Fashion Documentaries

How to look good Naked - Channel 4
 Stylist Gok Wan helps women and sometimes men of all shapes and sizes to feel good about their bodies without restorting to surgery.

Format
The format of the show is based on self esteem building exercises that Wan guides the participent through. These include:

- Showing a large picture of the participent in question semi nude in a public place (e.g. projected onto the side of a building or van), asking passers-by what they think. The reponse shown is positive, building the self esteem of the participant.
-Wan burns the participants underwear replacing it with more flattering items including "tummy tuck pants)
-The participant is invited along to a secret location for having their very own  naked photoshoot
- In the emotive finale, the participant parades down the catwalk with their new look in front of friends and family.

Catchphrases
Wans favourite and most famous catchphrases include "bangers"  which is his pet name for women's breast and "gorgeous" and  often calling the female participantating in the show "girlfriend".
Many of his other cathchphrases are puns on his name such as "Gok Shock" and "Fairy Gok Mother."






Snog, Marry, Avoid - BBC Three
Hosted by Jenny Frost

It focuses on transforming "fakery obessed" or "slap addicts" in Britian into natural beauties by stripping them of their skimpy clothes and layers of makeup and giving them a make-under instead of a make-over with the help of POD "personal overhaul device"

POD is a computer that "only understands natural beauty." It conducts a public analysis to ask the public wheter they would snog, marry, or aviod the participant as well as another random question which offers thosed questioned a chance to praise or criticise. After the questions it allows the person to choose their styles based on a celebrity and dresses them accordingly. It sometimes orders the person to "deep cleanse" where they have to take off all their makeup. After the transformation POD asks the public whay they think of the person.  The person is then re-introduced to their partner or relative outside the TV studio and their reaction is generally a positive one towards the more natural look. Later on in the show Jenny Frost will meet the person to see if they have kept their look and dicuss the transformation.



What Not To Wear - BBC
Presented by Trinny Woodall and Susannah Constantine.




Both women are often known for their tactile behaviour with the participants and for frequently referring to breast as "tits". They were also renowned for their direct comments on the show where Trinny comments have reduced some participants to tears and Susannah once spontaneously pulled a female candidate's underwear down during filming as her knicker line was present.

The participant is nominated by their friends and family for being particulalry unfashionable. The show then secretly follows and videotapes the nominated participant for two weeks. At the end of the two weeks, furthur experts review the secret footage and preparet to surprise the participant. During the surprise the participant is offered a £2000 cheque to buy a new wardrobe, however they must hand over the their entire existing wardrobe and be prepared for some harsh crictism and to receive fashion advice from two experts.

On the first day of the participants visit to the studio, there is a reveiw of the secret footage along with the participant. On videotape there are normally comments from family members and friends about the participant's style and appearance. The experts then go through their entire wardrobe, which has been brought with the participant. They critique the items and then most of the clothing gets discarded or even cut with scissors. The participant is asked to put on an outfit that they like and think most suits their figure, and then must face the 360 degree mirror. The experts comment honestly on why the outfit does not suit them, often being brutally honest.The experts give suggestions throughout the day and then present three different outfits to the participant to help illustrate the rules that they will need to follow as they shop for better clothing.
The participant is then given two days to shop for suitable clothing at a suitable and selected location. On the first day, they are left to their own devices, to test how much they have learnt about which clothes are suitable and comply with the rules. On the second day, the experts ambush the nominee and comment on whether the previous day's purchases complied with the correct guide lines as to which clothes to buy. The second day, the fashion gurus sit in a cafe and watch live video footage of the participant shopping and comment on whether the participant is following the rules given. If the participant is struggling, they rush to the scene to help. The experts then accompany the participant around the shops, providing advice and assistance, often being critical.

After all the shopping, hair stylists and makeup  artists work on the nominee's hair and makeup respectively. After the makeover, the participant reveals themselves to the experts and are brought to a full-length mirror to see their transformed state. The participant models three outfits for the experts, often showing confidence and poise. The participant departs and soon after, reveals themselves with their transformed appearance to their friends and family. Some time after the participant's makeover, the fashion gurus would pay them a surprise visit, in order to establish whether they have adhered to the rules for their clothing.



Intial Ideas for Fashion Documentary

Planning;
-Research similar products
-Reasearch  current Fashion documentarys
-Chooose a target audience that our documentary will be aimed at
Oragnise:
-Actors and the roles they will play
-Scripts,
-Filming locations (find out about being given permisson if needed)
-Filimg schedule
-Filming techniques and shots and we will be including
-Storyboard, showing the narrative of our Documentary

Construction;
-Hold a shot steady
-Frame shot
-Variety of shots/distances and effects
-Material that is revelant
-Mise en Scene selected
-Editing meaning is clear

Possible Filming locations
- Brighton Churchill Sqaure (may need to find out whether permisson would be need)
- The Lanes
-Markets
-Public areas (Highstreet, Pavilion Gardens, Parks and Cafe)
-The Beach
- My House

People:
-Me (Camera work)
-Jodie (Presenter)
-Nicola (person that will be madeover)
Other people may be needed to fill smaller parts

Watching Documentries

Name : The Boys That killed Stephen Lawerence - (BBC Panorama)

Type of documentary: Investigation




Notes:
  • Broadcasted on 26/Jul/2006
  • Opening scene's of archive news footage.
  • Headlines stated "Getting away with murder"
  • 5 Men guilty for murdering Stephen Lawrence in 1993 are still walking free
  • Mark Daly (The Presenter)
  • Duane Brooks - Stephen friend and key witness
  • Reinacting the scenes of the attack alongside witnesses narrating retelling  of what they saw  
  • Reconstruction - allowing the auidence to get a wider picture of what exactly happened and the actions leading up to murder and those that followed
  • Photographs of the crime scene, Blood, Stephen Body etc
  • Sound recordings of police interviews - introgatting suspects
  • Photograph's of the weapons linked to the suspects
  • Archive Survallance Footage
  • 5 Suspects (Neil Acourt, Jamie Acourt,   Dave Norris, Luke Knight, Gary Dobson)
  • 4stabbings link to the gang - before Stephen's Death
  • Interviewing 2 victims attacked by the gang
  • Evidence that the gang have committed and attempted murder before, however still have yet to be charged
  • Insitionional racism - rascism within the police
  • Flashbacks - to persuade the auidence to believe the programe.
  • Digital maps to pinpoint where people where at the time of the murder
  • John Davidson - represented as a "bent" copper
  • Reporting that Clifford Norris paying Davidson to keep quiet to protect the gang




Name: The Family
Type of documentary: Fly-on-the-wall








Notes:
  • Broadcasted on 17th September 2008
  • Following the Hughes Family which consists of Simon and his wife Jane, plus their four children Jessica,  "Wild child" Emily, "The clever one" Charlotte, and Tom.
  • The Family were filmed for 100 days and nights within their own home.
  • The programme is a modern take on of the original series from 1974, pioneered by Paul Weston
  • Opening Narration from Tom , explaingn that his mum is depressed - "she says because Emily goes out so much, but I think its more than that"
  • Music is used to add emotional resonances at one, a recording of Neil Diamonds "Sweet Caroline" plays over the household's early morning prepartions, timed so that the climactic line "Touching me, touching you" matches Simon and Janes goodbye embrace as he sets off to work.
  • Camera jump cuts to different locations within the house at different times
  • Focusing on Family arguements - entertainng for the audience whilst also keep them attentive.
  • Fading in between scenes , emphasising that time as pasted
  • Subtitles introducing each scene " Janes Birhtday" , "Mothers Day" etc


Name: Diana Witnesses in the Tunnel - Channel 4 Documentary
Type of Documentary: Investigation
Did the photographers chase the Princess of Wales to her death in the Pont d'Alma in August 1997? Were they too busy taking picutres to call the emergency services and did their presence hinder those services?




Notes:
  • The Press "The Princess of Wales was our bread and butter"
  • Controversial footage of her afer the crash
  • The paparatzi described as having "Blood on their hands"
  • Retracing the events leading up to the accident
  • Archive footage of CCTV - with voice narrating alongside
  • Enrick Paul - the french driver
  • Home footage
  • Reconstruction footage
  • French Investigation Dossair, original black and white images
  • Trevor Rhys Jones (BodyGuard)
  • Crash happened at 12.23pm
  • Dodi Al Fyed - (Diana's compainon who died in the crash)
  • Paparatzi photographes on the crash
  • Interviewing french photographer Ronald Parr (Pap and witness to the crash)
  • Giving the time of each stage that happened after the crash
  • Photograph blanking out Diana's Face
  • Accussing the photographers of getting in the way of paramedic and police
  • Use of tourist photo's
  • Public blaming the photographers for the princess of wales death
  • Laurent Solar (Press Management)
  • First news report on the BBC - all lays the blame on the paparattzi
  • 4am - Diana's time of death
  • Half a billion people watching the news
  • Diana's funeral held at westimister abbey - Broadcasted acrossed the nation
  • 2 Years of investigation was taken out before the accusations surrounding the photographs was cleared

Wednesday, 9 February 2011

Louis Theroux

Louis Theroux has been successful in his documentaries by being nominated and won awards such as being nominated an emmy for outstanding informational series, he successfully won best presenter for "When Louis Meets..."
Louis has also differentiated himself from other broadcasters like himself by looking into extremely deep topics and interviewing these in some cases unethical people in a light hearted humourous way.

  • Most Hated Family in America
The Most Hated Family in America was first aired on BBC 2 on 1 April 2007. The Gaurdian characterised its performance as "a ratings hit". The documentary received 4.3 million viewers.

Louis Theroux, himself stated in an interview after finnishing the documentary that the Phelps family (the family at the heart if this film) , were the most extreme people he had ever met. Despite this however, they were very kind and articulate and  especially to the younger members plesant. The Phelps family which is headed by Fred Phelps, run the "Westboro Baptist Church" in Kansas - a hate group with its core message being "God hates fags". Their twisted interpretation of the bible has lead them to believe that all tradegies on Earth are because of homosexuality, which is considered to be the worst sin of all and the public's increasing acceptance of homo and bi sexuality. They were made famous because of the church, regularly picketing funerals of fallen soliders killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, with signs such as "Thank god for dead soldiers" and " God hates fag soldiers". As with all his documentries, Louis manages to keep a level, unbiased opinion of all the family despite their extremism, accompanying them on protests and seeing their whole belief "system" for what it is. In this clip, Shirley Phelps explains the basis of their beliefs and tries to cliam that "Thou shalt not commit adultery" is about homosexuality, also claiming that God "does evil", it comes across quite outrageous but Louis remians utterly calm about it.

  • Behind Bars
In this documentary Louis soends a few weeks in San Quentin prison in San Franciso, one of America's toughest prisons and home to "gangbangers", rapists and murderers. Louis focuses on a group of prisoners though not in much detail as some subjects in his other films. These include guards, a gang member named "Playboy Nolan" and a man called David Silver, who is serving 500 years plus an 11 year life sentences. Throughout this film, the face that Louis is surrounded by murderers and rapists all the time, not just in the yard or eating with them, is surreal. During his stay he starts to focus on friendships between people of the same race and also relationships in the prison including a transgender woman named Deborah who shares a cell with her boyfriend. Despite the gloomy aesthetics of the place it is home to plenty of interesting people whom Louis connects with in some ways. In other ways, he makes them speak about things a little more than they would like to.



  • Gambling in Las Vegas
 

Gambling in Las Vegas is a investigative documentary in which Louis followers the high-rollers in Vegas who are the exprienced and most addicted of gamblers in the city. The documnetary aims to present the view that the risk-taking lifestyle of high rollers is a damanging aspect of their lives, however different features of the documentary make it clear that they are definatley unaware of the serious consequences that their addiction can have on them. As well as following the daily routine of the serial gamblers, Louis visits the managers of the casino in Vegas in a bid to discover their view on the issuse and their take on the on the lifestyles of these people.

In the beginning of the documentary Louis is driving along the famous Las Vegas Strip, and explaining through the use of voiceover his intentions for the documentary. As the car steadily progresses along road, low-angle shots used to the extravagance of the famous hotels an casinos on the strip. The low-angle shots used are as if they are from the viewpoints of a passenger in the car glaring through the window, giving the audience the feeling that they are witnessing the tall buildings on the strip through their own eyes.

Throughout the documentary, slow fades are used to progress to the next part of the documentary where a new point is made and different features of the gambler's lives are explored. For example after Louis has directly interviewed one of the gamblers on the routlette table, the camera slowly fades to black to progress the scene showing Louis contemplating his day in the casino. The gambler being interviewed explains why he feels he can not removed from the casino if his earnings are extremely low, presentening his as being daring and not fearful of his gambling habits getting the better of him. The fact that the camera fades into black after this moment represents the gambler as not being aware of the possible consequences that may meet him if indeed his earnings at the routlette table are poorer than he expected. This representation of the gambler is supported by the slow fade to black, as a tense moment in which happens to make the audience consider what may happen to the gambler as the result of his casual attitude towards his habits.

Gambling in Las Vegas uses the "Fly on the wall" convention of  documentary, as the camera is alongside Louis at all times, capturing the lifestyle of the "hardcore gamblers". The camera pursues the gambler through their hotel suite and local casino, thus capturing their actual daily routine where they gamble fearlessly inside the casino and go along with the thrill of the challenge and consequences of their addiction. This documentary technique for filming is used to expose the reality and seriousness of the gambler's daily actions and is essentially designed to invade the privacy on these people in an attempt to present the view that they continue with their consequential behaviour with a daring conscience. However, the actuality, of the camera work in the documentary is not always portraying the gamblers in negative light, as Louis presents humour during his exploration of the casino in which they play in, Louis engaged directly with the two expericened gamblers, as they socialise with their gambling associates and friends in what seems a plesant and outgoing manner.


Michael Moore




  •  Fahrenhiet 9/11
Fahrenhiet 9/11 takes a critical look at the presidency of George W Bush, the War on Terror and its coverage in the media. The film holds the record for the most highest box office receipts by a general release political film. It is the highest grossing documentary of all time domestically.
The film debuted at the 2004 Cannes Film Festival in the documentary film catergory and received a 20 mintue standing ovation (the longest standing ovation in the festivals history). The film was awarded the Palme d'Or, the festivals highest award.

                 
  • Bowling For Columbine
The film explores what Michael Moore suggests are the causes for the Columbine High School massacre and other acts of violence with guns. Moore focuses on the background and environment in which the massacre took place and some public and assumptions about related issuses. The film also uncovers the nature of violence in the United States.
In Moore's discussions with various people - including South Park co-creater Matt Stone, the National Rifle Association's (NRA) then president Charlton Heston, and musician Marilyn Manson - he seeks to explain why the Columbine massacre occurred and why the United States has a high violent crime rate (especially invovling guns).

Evaulating "Bowling for Coloumbine" 

Micheal Moore's documentary film "Bowling for Columbine" examines America's most memorable gun tragedies and also attempts to uncover the true reason for the Columbine High School shootings, where Moore himself leads on the investigation into the USA's gun laws and violence.

Moore's proactive attitude reflects how personally passionate and heartfelt he is about the issues covered in the film, as he is in the other docu-films such as, "Dude where's my country" and "Fahrenhiet 9/11". We can see the effect of this as he aims the camera through his point of view to demonstrate the American culture dealing with the problems of gun crime and gun control throughout the country. By basing the documentary around the Columbine massaccre he also successfully reveals the America has a bleak history of many gun tradegies and brings forth the ideology that these problems are out of control.

One of the facts that stands out the most is the number of deaths caused by guns in America, which tops the list of free world countries with 11,127 gun related deaths per year. Moore believes that the American society is powered by fear which is fuelled to them by on overload of media reports, about the dangers of world which then encourages people to protect themselves  by purchasing guns for self defence. Fear leads to violence, so does this explain why owning a gun for security comfort enables extreme tragedies like Columbine to occur so often in the USA.

Moore purposely positions scenes so that the audience can see both views on the subject being dicussed, for example the scene leading up to rocker Marilyn Manson's interview starts off with two young boys clearly happy and smiling whilst a voice over from Moore asks "So who was to blame?". This then leads into a montage of news reporters each zooming in at different times showing the viewer how all experts had an answer. Many different reasons were stated, usual suspects such as video games, violent movies, toy guns, however these are so popular around the world and yet other countries do not seem to have half of the problems like America does. The one common opinion all the experts had was "poster boy of fear""Marilyn Manson.
One reportter then swithced from blaming him to saying out of respect to the children lost, Marilyn Manson cancelled the last five days of his U.S tour. While this was being said one of Manson's CD covers was displayed which appeared as a very confronting image. This then tuns back to the experts blaming him quoting "this is probably the sickest group ever promoted by a mainstream record company". This scene is then followed by a preview of one of his video's dressed in all black clothing with big boots and a face fully covered with makeup. This scene is delibratley positioned before his interview to persuade the viewer to believe that Manson is partially to blame for the massacre as the two boys listened to his music.
Two years after Columbine,  Manson returned to Denver which "mounted protests". This was the opening line to the scene of Manson's interview.
Throughout the interview the camera alternated from the protest of Denver back to the scene of Manson's interview. By allowing Manson to defend himself allowed the viewer to see both sides of the controversial rocker.

Manson comes across as articulate and clear in his thoughts and offers some real insight into what he believes are problems facing the youths of American. He said all the media wants to do is to take something that happened and spin it into fear. meaning the media is a campaign full of fear and consumption. He brought up many other issuses, he mentioned how it seemed like everbody had forgotten the president, but one quote which changed everbody's mind on Manson was when Moore asked him, what he would say to the kids of Columbine,  Manson replied "I wouldn't say a single thing. I'd listen to what they had say and that is what no one did".
This lined ended the interview which encouraged the viewer to believe Manson was a good guy and also questioning that the  accusations was simply an act of the media trying to sell yet another overexaggerated story.

Moore tends to have a humourous style documenting which is entertaining for the viewers but also keeps them attentive. He uses many visual techniques, one example is use of a short cartoon " A Brief History of the United States"  to demonstate that America (particularly the white american) has always been a society run by terror. The cartoon is shot in a South Park like manner and tells a very fast-paced story, giving details of all the horrific things in American history. Some of the historic actions it covers are; killing the "savages" (Native Americans) because they were scared of thier unfamiliarity, killing each other as witches, possesion of African slaves for 200 years and the formation of both the Klu Klux Klan and The National Rifle Association (NRA). A characterized cartoon bullet narrates the story, which ironically represents all the awful things in American history and maybe also represents America as a nation today.
Not only does the cartoon come across as a comedy element for the viewers, it also reinforaces Moore's opinion to the viewers and still educates them in a different format , so if you aren't convinces by an interview, the same arguments are backed up by the use of a cartoon or found footage.

Another striking moment within the film is when Moore uses audio techniques of music to help portray the issuse of gun control. A montage of shocking and violent images of U.S killings that were committed in past history are shown whilst Louie Armstrong ionic song "What a Wonderful World" is playing alongside these various clips. The song contradicts the violence and destruction we can see and imply's just how NOT a wonderful world America is. It also highlights that the American military created the mass-murder atomsphere and therefore they are to blame.

Dialogue is used to show the viewer what American public are really like and what they care about. A message Moore creates associates with all the American public caring about making the headlines and acheiving a celebrity status.  People are shown to actually believe that making the headlines for good or bad is still a huge accomplishment, for example when a student from Oscoda High School is interviewed in relation to the two students who committed the murders at Columbine High School. The DJ student qoutes "No one told me who was number one on the list, which made me mad, like it was an ego thing knowing I was number one for something Oscoda , on the bomb threat list."  This example shows how the individual American didn't care how they made thier way into the headlines, which then rejects the idea that the media blames external factors when really it is the individuals in America.

Real life sound affects are used in the the documentary "Bowling for Columbine" to mae the viewer feel as is they are expriencing if themselves. Moore uses real life sound effects when interviewing a man at a local shooting range. Moore asks the man "why do you aim at bowling pins" his description was "its like a smaller scaled human". This makes the viewer start to think that a bowling pins could easily be used as a human targets whcih creates a suspicion that  bowling is  another key factor for the massacre in Columbine, just as much as Marilyn Manson. Whilst this was being said we are shown footage of the male aiming his gun at the "smaller scaled human." As Moore didn't add in any bullet sound effects and only used audio received by the camera ti create the real life situation and to show how much Americans love their guns and how they must live in so much fear that they even pratice shooting at what they see to be humans. This leaves us to deal with the question "Is America a nation of gun nuts or are they just nuts?".
  • Sicko
In this film, Moore investigates the health care in the United States, focusing on its health insurance policy and pharamaceutical industry. The film compares the for-profit, non-universial U.S system with the non-profit univerisal health care systems of Canada, the United Kingdom and cuba.
Sicko was nominated for an Academy Award Documentary Feature. It was also commended in the Australian Film Critics Association 2007 Film Award for Best Documentary.  

                                   




Moore effectively tells the mass audience, the emotionally-charged stories of American citizens who lost husbands, daughters and other family members to preventable diseases, all thanks to the international, well planned payment denials by health insurance companies.

Documentary Codes and Convetions

Documentary Modes

Exository
- Voice Over addresses the auidence directly: The voiceover may be a "voice of God" commentator (heard but not seen) or "voice of authority" (seen and heard usually an expert in the relavent field).
-Images are used to illustrate (or sometimes counterpoint) the voiceover;
-Editing is used for continuity to link together images which support the argument put forward in the voiceover;
-Attempts to persuade the audience of a particular point of view, often by appealing to logic and the idea of a common sense repsonse.

Observational
-Location shooting - Handheld cameras.
-Long takes dominate
-Synchronous (direct) sound recording
-No voiceover (in its purest form)
-No interviews
-Documentary makers prescene is hidden
-Subjects pretend they are not being filmed.

Participatory
-Documentary maker (and crew) interact with subject;
-Interviews dominate but tend to be formal - literally "on the run" questioning;
-Use of archive material - stills, news footage newspaper headlines, letters etc
-Location shooting - Handheld camera;
-Long takes dominate
-Synchronous sound recording
-Voiceover - usually by the documentary maker
-Documentary maker is visible to the audience and intervenes and participates in the action.

Reflective
-Borrows techniques from fiction or film for an emotinal, subjective response;
-Emphasises the expressive nature of the film, anti realist techniques e.g. re-enactments, expressive lighting and dramatic music;
-Voiceover (when present) is likely to be questioning and uncertain - rather than authoritative;
-Reliance on suggestion rather than fact.

Perfromative
-Documentary maker (and crew) interacts with subjects.
-Documentary maker comments on the process of making the documentary.
-The documentary is often shaped in to the narrative of an investigation or search -which their may be no satisfactory conclusion to.
-Addresses to the audience in an emotional and direct way.
Subject matter often to do with indentity (gender, sexuality) - rather than "factual" subjects.


Fly on the Wall
A extension of the observational mode, fly-on-the-wall approaches aim to blend into the background as the subjects go about their daily business. Filming might continue over a considerable period of time - six months say. In a sense the aim is to give the audience unmeditated access to the world.
Examples "The Family" and "The Model Agency"


Drama Documentary
In the absence of archive footage or access to witnesses, the filmmaker might stage dramatic reconstructions.


Mockumentary
Fictional films which parody the forms and conventions of  a documentary, often for humourous effect.

Investigation
Looks at topical issuses. May use hidden cameras and aims to expose or prove something at the end of the documentary.

Documentary Conventions

  • Archival Footage and Photographs
  • Voice Over/ Narration
  • Reconstructions
  • Confrontations
  • Opposing Forces
  • Conveys a personal response or critical perspective
  • Dramatic Suspense
  • Devolpment of audiences knoweledge